From 3daaa1f7f9391eaca4fb3bdd03ab61dd4277d468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnold Schrijver Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:27:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added github issue for Gitea about implementing ForgeFed federated accounts. --- considering-federation-watchlist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/considering-federation-watchlist.md b/considering-federation-watchlist.md index 987fe2e..3fccccf 100644 --- a/considering-federation-watchlist.md +++ b/considering-federation-watchlist.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ * :black_nib: [Ghost](https://forum.ghost.org/t/federate-over-activitypub/1989/15) - some discussion of the possibilities of supporting ActivityPub. -* :black_nib: [Gitea](https://talk.feneas.org/t/how-are-we-going-to-implement-forgefed-instances/122/2) - "While the Gitea developers are interested in ForgeFed, they will need a ready spec to implement it themselves", [Criztovyl](https://talk.feneas.org/u/criztovyl) +* :black_nib: [Gitea](https://talk.feneas.org/t/how-are-we-going-to-implement-forgefed-instances/122/2) - "While the Gitea developers are interested in ForgeFed, they will need a ready spec to implement it themselves", [Criztovyl](https://talk.feneas.org/u/criztovyl). See also [Preparing for Federation: "Remote" Users / Federated ID](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9045) * :black_nib: [GitLab](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/4013) - some discussion of the possibilities of supporting ActivityPub. See also: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/30991 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/44486. Most likely to happen if and when [ForgeFed is completed](https://talk.feneas.org/t/how-are-we-going-to-implement-forgefed-instances/122/2).