mirror of
https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-box.git
synced 2024-11-30 04:21:29 +00:00
58 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
|
# Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Design
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Why does sing-box not have feature X?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Every program contains novel features and omits someone's favorite feature. sing-box is designed with an eye to the
|
||
|
|
needs of performance, lightweight, usability, modularity, and code quality. Your favorite feature may be missing because
|
||
|
|
it doesn't fit, because it compromises performance or design clarity, or because it's a bad idea.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If it bothers you that sing-box is missing feature X, please forgive us and investigate the features that sing-box does
|
||
|
|
have. You might find that they compensate in interesting ways for the lack of X.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Naive outbound
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NaïveProxy's main function is chromium's network stack, and it makes no sense to implement only its transport protocol.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Protocol combinations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "underlying transport" in v2ray-core is actually a combination of a number of proprietary protocols and uses the
|
||
|
|
names of their upstream protocols, resulting in a great deal of Linguistic corruption.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For example, Trojan with v2ray's proprietary gRPC protocol, called Trojan gRPC by the v2ray community, is not actually a
|
||
|
|
protocol and has no role outside of abusing CDNs.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Tun
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### What is tun?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
tun is a virtual network device in unix systems, and in windows there is wintun developed by WireGuard as an
|
||
|
|
alternative. The tun module of sing-box includes traffic processing, automatic routing, and network device listening,
|
||
|
|
and is mainly used as a transparent proxy.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### How is it different from system proxy?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
System proxy usually only supports TCP and is not accepted by all applications, but tun can handle all traffic.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### How is it different from traditional transparent proxy?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
They are usually only supported under Linux and require manipulation of firewalls like iptables, while tun only modifies
|
||
|
|
the routing table.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The tproxy UDP is considered to have poor performance due to the need to create a new connection every write back in
|
||
|
|
v2ray and clash, but it is optimized in sing-box so you can still use it if needed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### How does it handle DNS?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In traditional transparent proxies, it is usually necessary to manually hijack port 53 to the DNS proxy server, while
|
||
|
|
tun is more flexible.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
sing-box's `auto_route` will hijack all DNS requests except on [macOS and Android](./known-issues#dns).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You need to manually configure how to handle tun hijacked DNS traffic, see [Hijack DNS](/examples/dns-hijack).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Why I can't use it with other local proxies (e.g. via socks)?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tun will hijack all traffic, including other proxy applications. In order to make tun work with other applications, you
|
||
|
|
need to create an inbound to proxy traffic from other applications or make them bypass the route.
|