2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-07 18:06:07 +00:00
|
|
|
iodine - http://code.kryo.se/iodine
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-07 18:06:07 +00:00
|
|
|
***********************************
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a piece of software that lets you tunnel IPv4 data through a DNS
|
|
|
|
server. This can be usable in different situations where internet access is
|
|
|
|
firewalled, but DNS queries are allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 19:18:35 +00:00
|
|
|
QUICKSTART:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try it out within your own LAN! Follow these simple steps:
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
- On your server, run: ./iodined -f 10.0.0.1 test.com
|
2006-08-13 19:18:35 +00:00
|
|
|
(If you already use the 10.0.0.0 network, use another internal net like
|
|
|
|
172.16.0.0)
|
2006-11-18 16:26:39 +00:00
|
|
|
- Enter a password
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
- On the client, run: ./iodine -f -r 192.168.0.1 test.com
|
|
|
|
(Replace 192.168.0.1 with your server's ip address)
|
2006-11-18 16:26:39 +00:00
|
|
|
- Enter the same password
|
2006-08-13 19:18:35 +00:00
|
|
|
- Now the client has the tunnel ip 10.0.0.2 and the server has 10.0.0.1
|
|
|
|
- Try pinging each other through the tunnel
|
|
|
|
- Done! :)
|
|
|
|
To actually use it through a relaying nameserver, see below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
HOW TO USE:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Note: server and client are required to speak the exact same protocol. In most
|
|
|
|
cases, this means running the same iodine version. Unfortunately, implementing
|
|
|
|
backward and forward protocol compatibility is usually not feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
Server side:
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
To use this tunnel, you need control over a real domain (like mydomain.com),
|
|
|
|
and a server with a public IP address to run iodined on. If this server
|
|
|
|
already runs a DNS program, change its listening port and then use iodined's
|
|
|
|
-b option to let iodined forward the DNS requests. (Note that this procedure
|
|
|
|
is not advised in production environments, because iodined's DNS forwarding
|
|
|
|
is not completely transparent.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, delegate a subdomain (say, t1.mydomain.com) to the iodined server.
|
|
|
|
If you use BIND for your domain, add two lines like these to the zone file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1 IN NS t1ns.mydomain.com. ; note the dot!
|
|
|
|
t1ns IN A 10.15.213.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "NS" line is all that's needed to route queries for the "t1" subdomain
|
|
|
|
to the "t1ns" server. We use a short name for the subdomain, to keep as much
|
|
|
|
space as possible available for the data traffic. At the end of the "NS" line
|
|
|
|
is the name of your iodined server. This can be any name, pointing anywhere,
|
|
|
|
but in this case it's easily kept in the same zone file. It must be a name
|
|
|
|
(not an IP address), and that name itself must have an A record (not a CNAME).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your iodined server has a dynamic IP, use a dynamic dns provider. Simply
|
|
|
|
point the "NS" line to it, and leave the "A" line out:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1 IN NS myname.mydyndnsprovider.com. ; note the dot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then reload or restart your nameserver program. Now any DNS queries for
|
|
|
|
domains ending in t1.mydomain.com will be sent to your iodined server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally start iodined on your server. The first argument is the IP address
|
|
|
|
inside the tunnel, which can be from any range that you don't use yet (for
|
|
|
|
example 192.168.99.1), and the second argument is the assigned domain (in this
|
|
|
|
case t1.mydomain.com). Using the -f option will keep iodined running in the
|
|
|
|
foreground, which helps when testing. iodined will open a virtual interface
|
|
|
|
("tun device"), and will also start listening for DNS queries on UDP port 53.
|
|
|
|
Either enter a password on the commandline (-P pass) or after the server has
|
|
|
|
started. Now everything is ready for the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there is a chance you'll be using an iodine tunnel from unexpected
|
|
|
|
environments, start iodined with a -c option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting commandline in this example situation:
|
|
|
|
./iodined -f -c -P secretpassword 192.168.99.1 t1.mydomain.com
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Client side:
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
All the setup is done, just start iodine. It takes one or two arguments, the
|
2009-01-04 10:58:52 +00:00
|
|
|
first is the local relaying DNS server (optional) and the second is the domain
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
you used (t1.mydomain.com). If you don't specify the first argument, the
|
|
|
|
system's current DNS setting will be consulted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If DNS queries are allowed to any computer, you can directly give the iodined
|
|
|
|
server's address as first argument (in the example: t1ns.mydomain.com or
|
|
|
|
10.15.213.99). In that case, it may also happen that _any_ traffic is allowed
|
|
|
|
to the DNS port (53 UDP) of any computer. Iodine will detect this, and switch
|
|
|
|
to raw UDP tunneling if possible. To force DNS tunneling in any case, use the
|
|
|
|
-r option (especially useful when testing within your own network).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The client's tunnel interface will get an IP close to the server's (in this
|
|
|
|
case 192.168.99.2 or .3 etc.) and a suitable MTU. Enter the same password as
|
|
|
|
on the server either as commandline option or after the client has started.
|
|
|
|
Using the -f option will keep the iodine client running in the foreground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting commandline in this example situation:
|
|
|
|
./iodine -f -P secretpassword t1.mydomain.com
|
|
|
|
(add -r to force DNS tunneling even if raw UDP tunneling would be possible)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From either side, you should now be able to ping the IP address on the other
|
|
|
|
end of the tunnel. In this case, ping 192.168.99.1 from the iodine client, and
|
|
|
|
192.168.99.2 or .3 etc. from the iodine server.
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
MISC. INFO:
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-05 22:08:56 +00:00
|
|
|
IPv6:
|
|
|
|
At the moment the iodined server only supports IPv4. The client can use
|
|
|
|
IPv4 or IPv6 nameservers to connect, and the relay nameservers will translate
|
|
|
|
between protocols automatically if needed. If the server hostname has an AAAA
|
|
|
|
record registered IPv6 mode will not work - in this case the client must be
|
|
|
|
configured with an IPv4 nameserver. The data inside the tunnel is IPv4 only.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-16 09:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Routing:
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
It is possible to route all traffic through the DNS tunnel. To do this, first
|
|
|
|
add a host route to the nameserver used by iodine over the wired/wireless
|
|
|
|
interface with the default gateway as gateway. Then replace the default
|
|
|
|
gateway with the iodined server's IP address inside the DNS tunnel, and
|
|
|
|
configure the server to do NAT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, note that the tunneled data traffic is not encrypted at all, and can
|
|
|
|
be read and changed by external parties relatively easily. For maximum
|
|
|
|
security, run a VPN through the DNS tunnel (=double tunneling), or use secure
|
|
|
|
shell (SSH) access, possibly with port forwarding. The latter can also be used
|
|
|
|
for web browsing, when you run a web proxy (for example Privoxy) on your
|
|
|
|
server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing:
|
|
|
|
The iodined server replies to NS requests sent for subdomains of the tunnel
|
|
|
|
domain. If your iodined subdomain is t1.mydomain.com, send a NS request for
|
|
|
|
foo123.t1.mydomain.com to see if the delegation works. dig is a good tool
|
|
|
|
for this:
|
|
|
|
dig -t NS foo123.t1.mydomain.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, the iodined server will answer requests starting with 'z' for any of the
|
|
|
|
supported request types, for example:
|
|
|
|
dig -t TXT z456.t1.mydomain.com
|
|
|
|
dig -t SRV z456.t1.mydomain.com
|
|
|
|
dig -t CNAME z456.t1.mydomain.com
|
|
|
|
The reply should look like garbled text in all these cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational info:
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
The DNS-response fragment size is normally autoprobed to get maximum bandwidth.
|
|
|
|
To force a specific value (and speed things up), use the -m option.
|
2009-07-16 09:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
The DNS hostnames are normally used up to their maximum length, 255 characters.
|
|
|
|
Some DNS relays have been found that answer full-length queries rather
|
|
|
|
unreliably, giving widely varying (and mostly very bad) results of the
|
|
|
|
fragment size autoprobe on repeated tries. In these cases, use the -M switch
|
|
|
|
to reduce the DNS hostname length to for example 200 characters, which makes
|
|
|
|
these DNS relays much more stable. This is also useful on some "de-optimizing"
|
|
|
|
DNS relays that stuff the response with two full copies of the query, leaving
|
|
|
|
very little space for downstream data (also not capable of EDNS0). The -M
|
|
|
|
switch can trade some upstream bandwidth for downstream bandwidth. Note that
|
|
|
|
the minimum -M value is about 100, since the protocol can split packets (1200
|
|
|
|
bytes max) in only 16 fragments, requiring at least 75 real data bytes per
|
|
|
|
fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upstream data is sent gzipped encoded with Base32; or Base64 if the relay
|
|
|
|
server supports mixed case and '+' in domain names; or Base64u if '_' is
|
|
|
|
supported instead; or Base128 if high-byte-value characters are supported.
|
|
|
|
This upstream encoding is autodetected. The DNS protocol allows one query per
|
|
|
|
packet, and one query can be max 256 chars. Each domain name part can be max
|
|
|
|
63 chars. So your domain name and subdomain should be as short as possible to
|
|
|
|
allow maximum upstream throughput.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several DNS request types are supported, with the NULL type expected to provide
|
|
|
|
the largest downstream bandwidth. Other available types are TXT, SRV, MX,
|
|
|
|
CNAME and A (returning CNAME), in decreasing bandwidth order. Normally the
|
|
|
|
"best" request type is autodetected and used. However, DNS relays may impose
|
|
|
|
limits on for example NULL and TXT, making SRV or MX actually the best choice.
|
|
|
|
This is not autodetected, but can be forced using the -T option. It is
|
|
|
|
advisable to try various alternatives especially when the autodetected request
|
|
|
|
type provides a downstream fragment size of less than 200 bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that SRV, MX and A (returning CNAME) queries may/will cause additional
|
|
|
|
lookups by "smart" caching nameservers to get an actual IP address, which may
|
|
|
|
either slow down or fail completely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNS responses for non-NULL queries can be encoded with the same set of codecs
|
|
|
|
as upstream data. This is normally also autodetected, but no fully exhaustive
|
|
|
|
tests are done, so some problems may not be noticed when selecting more
|
|
|
|
advanced codecs. In that case, you'll see failures/corruption in the fragment
|
|
|
|
size autoprobe. In particular, several DNS relays have been found that change
|
|
|
|
replies returning hostnames (SRV, MX, CNAME, A) to lowercase only when that
|
|
|
|
hostname exceeds ca. 180 characters. In these and similar cases, use the -O
|
|
|
|
option to try other downstream codecs; Base32 should always work.
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Normal operation now is for the server to _not_ answer a DNS request until
|
|
|
|
the next DNS request has come in, a.k.a. being "lazy". This way, the server
|
|
|
|
will always have a DNS request handy when new downstream data has to be sent.
|
|
|
|
This greatly improves (interactive) performance and latency, and allows to
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
slow down the quiescent ping requests to 4 second intervals by default, and
|
|
|
|
possibly much slower. In fact, the main purpose of the pings now is to force
|
|
|
|
a reply to the previous ping, and prevent DNS server timeouts (usually at
|
|
|
|
least 5-10 seconds per RFC1035). Some DNS servers are more impatient and will
|
|
|
|
give SERVFAIL errors (timeouts) in periods without tunneled data traffic. All
|
|
|
|
data should still get through in these cases, but iodine will reduce the ping
|
|
|
|
interval to 1 second anyway (-I1) to reduce the number of error messages. This
|
|
|
|
may not help for very impatient DNS relays like dnsadvantage.com (ultradns),
|
|
|
|
which time out in 1 second or even less. Yet data will still get trough, and
|
|
|
|
you can ignore the SERVFAIL errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running on a local network without any DNS server in-between, try
|
|
|
|
-I 50 (iodine and iodined close the connection after 60 seconds of silence).
|
|
|
|
The only time you'll notice a slowdown, is when DNS reply packets go missing;
|
|
|
|
the iodined server then has to wait for a new ping to re-send the data. You can
|
|
|
|
speed this up by generating some upstream traffic (keypress, ping). If this
|
|
|
|
happens often, check your network for bottlenecks and/or run with -I1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The delayed answering in lazy mode will cause some "carrier grade" commercial
|
|
|
|
DNS relays to repeatedly re-send the same DNS query to the iodined server.
|
|
|
|
If the DNS relay is actually implemented as a pool of parallel servers,
|
|
|
|
duplicate requests may even arrive from multiple sources. This effect will
|
|
|
|
only be visible in the network traffic at the iodined server, and will not
|
|
|
|
affect the client's connection. Iodined will notice these duplicates, and send
|
|
|
|
the same answer (when its time has come) to both the original query and the
|
|
|
|
latest duplicate. After that, the full answer is cached for a short while.
|
|
|
|
Delayed duplicates that arrive at the server even later, get a reply that the
|
|
|
|
iodine client will ignore (if it ever arrives there).
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
If you have problems, try inspecting the traffic with network monitoring tools
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
like tcpdump or ethereal/wireshark, and make sure that the relaying DNS server
|
|
|
|
has not cached the response. A cached error message could mean that you
|
|
|
|
started the client before the server. The -D (and -DD) option on the server
|
|
|
|
can also show received and sent queries.
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-05 13:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
TIPS & TRICKS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your port 53 is taken on a specific interface by an application that does
|
|
|
|
not use it, use -p on iodined to specify an alternate port (like -p 5353) and
|
|
|
|
use for instance iptables (on Linux) to forward the traffic:
|
|
|
|
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to :5353
|
|
|
|
(Sent in by Tom Schouten)
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
Iodined will reject data from clients that have not been active (data/pings)
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
for more than 60 seconds. Similarly, iodine will exit when no downstream
|
|
|
|
data has been received for 60 seconds. In case of a long network outage or
|
|
|
|
similar, just restart iodine (re-login), possibly multiple times until you get
|
2009-09-20 15:11:10 +00:00
|
|
|
your old IP address back. Once that's done, just wait a while, and you'll
|
|
|
|
eventually see the tunneled TCP traffic continue to flow from where it left
|
|
|
|
off before the outage.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
With the introduction of the downstream packet queue in the server, its memory
|
|
|
|
usage has increased with several megabytes in the default configuration.
|
|
|
|
For use in low-memory environments (e.g. running on your DSL router), you can
|
|
|
|
decrease USERS and undefine OUTPACKETQ_LEN in user.h without any ill conse-
|
|
|
|
quence, assuming at most one client will be connected at any time. A small
|
|
|
|
DNSCACHE_LEN is still advised, preferably 2 or higher, however you can also
|
|
|
|
undefine it to save a few more kilobytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section tabulates some performance measurements. To view properly, use
|
|
|
|
a fixed-width font like Courier.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Measurements were done in protocol 00000502 in lazy mode; upstream encoding
|
|
|
|
always Base128; iodine -M255; iodined -m1130. Network conditions were not
|
|
|
|
extremely favorable; results are not benchmarks but a realistic indication of
|
|
|
|
real-world performance that can be expected in similar situations.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Upstream/downstream throughput was measured by scp'ing a file previously
|
|
|
|
read from /dev/urandom (i.e. incompressible), and measuring size with
|
|
|
|
"ls -l ; sleep 30 ; ls -l" on a separate non-tunneled connection. Given the
|
|
|
|
large scp block size of 16 kB, this gives a resolution of 4.3 kbit/s, which
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
explains why some values are exactly equal.
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Ping round-trip times measured with "ping -c100", presented are average rtt
|
|
|
|
and mean deviation (indicating spread around the average), in milliseconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Situation 1:
|
|
|
|
Laptop -> Wifi AP -> Home server -> DSL provider -> Datacenter
|
|
|
|
iodine DNS "relay" bind9 DNS cache iodined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
downstr. upstream downstr. ping-up ping-down
|
|
|
|
fragsize kbit/s kbit/s avg +/-mdev avg +/-mdev
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iodine -> Wifi AP :53
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
-Tnull (= -Oraw) 982 43.6 131.0 28.0 4.6 26.8 3.4
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iodine -> Home server :53
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
-Tnull (= -Oraw) 1174 48.0 305.8 26.6 5.0 26.9 8.4
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iodine -> DSL provider :53
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
-Tnull (= -Oraw) 1174 56.7 367.0 20.6 3.1 21.2 4.4
|
|
|
|
-Ttxt -Obase32 730 56.7 174.7*
|
|
|
|
-Ttxt -Obase64 874 56.7 174.7
|
|
|
|
-Ttxt -Obase128 1018 56.7 174.7
|
|
|
|
-Ttxt -Oraw 1162 56.7 358.2
|
|
|
|
-Tsrv -Obase128 910 56.7 174.7
|
|
|
|
-Tcname -Obase32 151 56.7 43.6
|
|
|
|
-Tcname -Obase128 212 56.7 52.4
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iodine -> DSL provider :53
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
wired (no Wifi) -Tnull 1174 74.2 585.4 20.2 5.6 19.6 3.4
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
[174.7* : these all have 2frag/packet]
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Situation 2:
|
|
|
|
Laptop -> Wifi+vpn / wired -> Home server
|
|
|
|
iodine iodined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
downstr. upstream downstr. ping-up ping-down
|
|
|
|
fragsize kbit/s kbit/s avg +/-mdev avg +/-mdev
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
wifi + openvpn -Tnull 1186 166.0 1022.3 6.3 1.3 6.6 1.6
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-29 20:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
wired -Tnull 1186 677.2 2464.1 1.3 0.2 1.3 0.1
|
2009-09-20 21:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance is strongly coupled to low ping times, as iodine requires
|
|
|
|
confirmation for every data fragment before moving on to the next. Allowing
|
|
|
|
multiple fragments in-flight like TCP could possibly increase performance,
|
|
|
|
but it would likely cause serious overload for the intermediary DNS servers.
|
|
|
|
The current protocol scales performance with DNS responsivity, since the
|
|
|
|
DNS servers are on average handling at most one DNS request per client.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-05 13:18:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
PORTABILITY:
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-06 19:58:29 +00:00
|
|
|
iodine has been tested on Linux (arm, ia64, x86, AMD64 and SPARC64), FreeBSD
|
2009-03-21 13:21:51 +00:00
|
|
|
(ia64, x86), OpenBSD (x86), NetBSD (x86), MacOS X (ppc and x86, with
|
|
|
|
http://tuntaposx.sourceforge.net/). and Windows (with OpenVPN TAP32 driver, see
|
|
|
|
win32 readme file). It should be easy to port to other unix-like systems that
|
|
|
|
has TUN/TAP tunneling support. Let us know if you get it to run on other
|
|
|
|
platforms.
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE NAME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name iodine was chosen since it starts with IOD (IP Over DNS) and since
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
iodine has atomic number 53, which happens to be the DNS port number.
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 19:18:35 +00:00
|
|
|
THANKS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- To kuxien for FreeBSD and OS X testing
|
2006-11-02 06:38:16 +00:00
|
|
|
- To poplix for code audit
|
2006-08-13 19:18:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
AUTHORS & LICENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-03 23:27:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Bjorn Andersson <flex@kryo.se>, Erik Ekman <yarrick@kryo.se>
|
2009-12-29 20:10:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Also major contributions by Anne Bezemer.
|
2006-06-23 08:54:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 11:38:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any purpose
|
|
|
|
with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice
|
|
|
|
and this permission notice appear in all copies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH
|
|
|
|
REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
|
|
|
|
FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT,
|
|
|
|
INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM
|
|
|
|
LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR
|
|
|
|
OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
2006-11-18 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-03-21 06:40:53 +00:00
|
|
|
MD5 implementation by L. Peter Deutsch (license and source in src/md5.[ch])
|
2006-11-18 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2002 Aladdin Enterprises. All rights reserved.
|