Update README

This commit is contained in:
Arun Prakash Jana 2017-04-13 20:10:23 +05:30
parent 275b42efb0
commit 6f1ea2e61e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: A75979F35C080412

View file

@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Noice is Not Noice, a noicer fork...
- [Behaviour and navigation](#behaviour-and-navigation) - [Behaviour and navigation](#behaviour-and-navigation)
- [File association](#file-association) - [File association](#file-association)
- [Optimization](#optimization) - [Optimization](#optimization)
- [Performance](#performance)
- [Installation](#installation) - [Installation](#installation)
- [Usage](#usage) - [Usage](#usage)
- [Keyboard shortcuts](#keyboard-shortcuts) - [Keyboard shortcuts](#keyboard-shortcuts)
@ -105,7 +106,9 @@ I chose to fork because:
- Compiler warnings fixed - Compiler warnings fixed
- strip the final binary - strip the final binary
The following top excerpt shows the difference in nnn and ncdu memory usage while listing `/usr/bin` with 1439 entries in disk usage analyzer mode, sorted by total content size: ### Performance
nnn vs. ncdu memory usage while listing `/usr/bin` with 1439 entries in disk usage analyzer mode, sorted by total content size:
``` ```
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
@ -113,6 +116,14 @@ The following top excerpt shows the difference in nnn and ncdu memory usage whil
10409 vaio 20 0 20452 9172 2356 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.83 nnn -d 10409 vaio 20 0 20452 9172 2356 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.83 nnn -d
``` ```
nnn vs. ranger memory usage while viewing a directory with 10,178 files, sorted by size:
```
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
22465 vaio 20 0 233956 192136 7896 S 0.0 3.9 0:05.31 /usr/bin/python -O /usr/bin/ranger
21743 vaio 20 0 55984 44648 2468 S 0.0 0.9 0:01.17 nnn -d
```
### Installation ### Installation
nnn needs a curses implementation and standard libc. nnn needs a curses implementation and standard libc.