Fix swaybar axis event logic

Uses 'visible' instead of 'focused', since we may scroll on a bar which
isn't the focused output.

We can't use "next_on_output" or "prev_on_output" to implement this,
because it only modify the focused output. So scrolling on an unfocused
output will affect the incorrect one.

We just use the "workspace name" command instead.
This commit is contained in:
Scott Anderson 2018-04-22 17:13:52 +12:00
parent 72149111a5
commit 4dfbc3160c

View file

@ -156,31 +156,56 @@ static void wl_pointer_axis(void *data, struct wl_pointer *wl_pointer,
if (!sway_assert(output, "axis with no active output")) {
return;
}
double amt = wl_fixed_to_double(value);
if (!bar->config->wrap_scroll) {
int i = 0;
struct swaybar_workspace *ws = NULL;
wl_list_for_each(ws, &output->workspaces, link) {
if (ws->focused) {
break;
}
++i;
}
int len = wl_list_length(&output->workspaces);
if (!sway_assert(i != len, "axis with null workspace")) {
if (amt == 0.0) {
return;
}
if (i == 0 && amt > 0) {
return; // Do not wrap
}
if (i == len - 1 && amt < 0) {
return; // Do not wrap
}
struct swaybar_workspace *first = NULL;
struct swaybar_workspace *active = NULL;
struct swaybar_workspace *last;
struct swaybar_workspace *iter;
wl_list_for_each(iter, &output->workspaces, link) {
if (!first) {
first = iter;
}
const char *workspace_name =
amt < 0 ? "prev_on_output" : "next_on_output";
ipc_send_workspace_command(bar, workspace_name);
if (iter->visible) {
active = iter;
}
last = iter;
}
if (!sway_assert(active, "axis with null workspace")) {
return;
}
struct swaybar_workspace *new;
if (amt > 0.0) {
if (active == first) {
if (!bar->config->wrap_scroll) {
return;
}
new = last;
}
new = wl_container_of(active->link.prev, new, link);
} else {
if (active == last) {
if (!bar->config->wrap_scroll) {
return;
}
new = first;
}
new = wl_container_of(active->link.next, new, link);
}
ipc_send_workspace_command(bar, new->name);
}
static void wl_pointer_frame(void *data, struct wl_pointer *wl_pointer) {