arrange: use int not size_t for title offsets

This changes `apply_tabbed_layout` and `apply_stacked_layout` to use
`int` instead of `size_t`. This is necessary for tabbed and stacked
containers to be positioned correctly when the y-location is negative.
The reasoning for this is signed plus unsigned is always an unsigned
value. This was causing the y-location of the container to be
positioned near `INT_MIN` due to an unsigned integer underflow
This commit is contained in:
Brian Ashworth 2019-03-10 15:00:15 -04:00 committed by Drew DeVault
parent fb4838c943
commit d57755d05c

View file

@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void apply_tabbed_layout(list_t *children, struct wlr_box *parent) {
} }
for (int i = 0; i < children->length; ++i) { for (int i = 0; i < children->length; ++i) {
struct sway_container *child = children->items[i]; struct sway_container *child = children->items[i];
size_t parent_offset = child->view ? 0 : container_titlebar_height(); int parent_offset = child->view ? 0 : container_titlebar_height();
container_remove_gaps(child); container_remove_gaps(child);
child->x = parent->x; child->x = parent->x;
child->y = parent->y + parent_offset; child->y = parent->y + parent_offset;
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void apply_stacked_layout(list_t *children, struct wlr_box *parent) {
} }
for (int i = 0; i < children->length; ++i) { for (int i = 0; i < children->length; ++i) {
struct sway_container *child = children->items[i]; struct sway_container *child = children->items[i];
size_t parent_offset = child->view ? 0 : int parent_offset = child->view ? 0 :
container_titlebar_height() * children->length; container_titlebar_height() * children->length;
container_remove_gaps(child); container_remove_gaps(child);
child->x = parent->x; child->x = parent->x;