container_flatten removes the container from the tree (via
container_replace) before destroying it. When destroying, the recent
changes to handle_seat_node_destroy incorrectly assumes that the
container has a parent.
This adds a check for destroying a container which is no longer in the
tree. If this is the case, focus does not need to be changed.
* Click and hold a scrollbar
* Drag the cursor onto another surface
* While still holding the original button, press and release another
cursor button
* Things get weird
There's two ways to fix this. Either cancel the seat operation and do
the other click, or continue the seat operation and ignore the other
click. I opted for the latter (ignoring the click) because it's easier
to implement, and I suspect a second click during a seat operation is
probably unintentional anyway.
* Have multiple outputs
* Launch swaylock
* Unplug an output (possibly has to be the last "connected" one)
* The swaylock surface on the remaining output would not respond to key
events
This was happening because when the output destroys, focus was not given
to the other swaylock surface.
This patch makes focus be transferred to another surface owned by the
same Wayland client, but only if input was inhibited by the surface
being destroyed, and only if it's in the overlay layer. I figure it's
best to be overly specific and relax the requirements later if needed.
This patch removes a check in seat_set_focus_surface which was
preventing focus from being passed from a layer surface to any other
surface. I don't know of a use case for this check, but it's possible
that this change could produce issues.
Re-focus on the container on which the cursor hovers over. A
special case is, if there are menus or other subsurfaces open
in the focused container. It will prefer the focused container
as long as there are subsurfaces.
This commit starts caching the previous node as well as the
previous x/y cursor position. Re-calculating the previous
focused node by looking at the current state of the cursor
position does not work, if the environment changes.
* New configuration option: raise_floating
(From the discussion on https://github.com/i3/i3/issues/2990)
* By default, it still raises the window on focus, otherwise it
will raise the window on click.
To reproduce the problem, create layout
H[view V[view view view-focused]], then switch to another workspace and
have the previously focused view in the vsplit close (eg. using
criteria, or an mpv video finishing). Return to the workspace using
`$mod+<num>` and the entire vsplit would be focused. This happens
because handle_seat_node_destroy would only set a new focus if the
currently focused view or a parent was being destroyed. To fix it, it
needs to set a sibling of the destroying container to focus_inactive
regardless of the current focus, then restore current focus if needed.
This patch changes the function accordingly. Additionally:
* The function now makes an early return if the node being destroyed is
a workspace.
* set_focus has been renamed to needs_new_focus. This variable is true
if the head focus needs to be changed.
Fixes `hide_edge_borders smart` when gaps are in use.
Implements `hide_edge_borders smart_no_gaps` and `smart_borders
on|no_gaps|off`.
Since `smart_borders on` is equivalent to `hide_edge_borders smart`
and `smart_borders no_gaps` is equivalent to `hide_edge_borders
smart_no_gaps`, I opted to just save the last value set for
`hide_edge_borders` and restore that on `smart_borders off`. This
simplifies the conditions for setting the border.
It's better to use DT_RPATH dynamic section of the elf binary to store
the paths of libraries to load instead of overwriting LD_LIBRARY_PATH
for the whole environment, causing surprises. This solution is much more
transparent and perfectly suitable for running contained installations
of wayland/wlroots/sway.
The code unsetting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD was also deleted as
it's a placebo security at best - we should trust the execution path
that leads us to running sway, and it's way too late to care about those
variables since we already started executing our compositor, thus we
would be compromised anyway.
